The human right to freedom of expression has different parts or aspects: The right to freedom of opinion, the right to freedom of speech, the right to freedom of association and peaceful assembly.<\/p>\n
These rights are inseparably linked with the public’s right to receive objective and comprehensive, accurate, factual and impartial information.<\/p>\n
The right to freedom of expression doesn\u2019t mean the freedom of the rich and the mighty to publish what they want. The freedom of press, the freedom of mass media doesn\u2019t mean the freedom of trade, of business; it\u2019s not an economic freedom. It\u2019s not the right of the 1% to impose their opinion on the 99%.<\/p>\n
The greatest threats to our right to freedom of information are the wars and the war propaganda, the manipulation by the lies of war. We all know the saying that the first casualty of war is truth. Defending the right to freedom of expression doesn\u2019t mean the freedom of the warmongers or the racists. This means: we must get rid from so-called \u201cembedded journalism\u201d. We must get rid from all so-called journalists who are on the payroll of the warmongers.<\/p>\n
The balance of Western Wars in the last two decades is disastrous. One million dead, several millions injured, tens of millions displaced persons. Instead of the promised \u201cdemocracy\u201d the destruction of any state order and secure life. USA sided by NATO and other war coalitions left behind scorched earth.<\/p>\n
The terrorist attacks are a direct result of these wars. The destruction of nations by military and intelligence activities is now having its revenge. We are well aware: As well as the terrorist groups were built up, adviced and controlled by secret services, these services are involved in the actual terrorist attacks.<\/p>\n
We know from history that Wars are always started with lies and blackmail: WW I \u2013 the blackmailing Austrian ultimatum against Serbia, WW II \u2013 the so-called attack on the Gleiwitz radio transmitter; Vietnam – the fabricated incident in the Gulf of Tonking. NATO-Aggression against Yugoslavia \u2013 the so-called Massacre of Racak, followed up by the Rambouillet-Ultimatum; Iraq \u2013 the lie up weapons of mass destruction; Libya and Syria \u2013 the alleged murder of \u201ctheir own people\u201d.<\/p>\n
The coup d’\u00e9tat in Ukraine 2014 has significant similarities with the Syrian scenario. The shots fired at the Maidan in Kiev, when snipers fired on demonstrators and the police still haven’t been cleared up.<\/p>\n
And the beginning of uprising in Syria was not a \u201cpeaceful protest\u201d as claimed by the Western media.<\/p>\n
AP, March 23, 2011, wrote:<\/p>\n
\u201cThe violence in Daraa, a city of about 300,000 near the border with Jordan, was fast becoming a major challenge for President Bashar Assad\u201d. \u2013 (in fact its population is 75,000 )<\/p>\n
\u201cSyrian police launched a relentless assault Wednesday on a neighborhood sheltering anti-government protesters [Daraa], fatally shooting at least 15 in an operation that began before dawn, witnesses said.\u201d<\/p>\n
Another story was told two days before, by Israel National News, Arutz Sheva, March 21, 2011:<\/p>\n
\u201cPolice opened fire on armed protesters killing four and injuring as many as 100 others, seven police officers were killed, and the Baath Party Headquarters and courthouse were torched.\u201d<\/p>\n
According to Israeli intelligence sources (Debka, August14, 2011):<\/p>\n
NATO headquarters in Brussels and the Turkish high command are meanwhile drawing up plans for their first military step in Syria, which is to arm the rebels with weapons for combating the tanks and helicopters spearheading the Assad regime\u2019s crackdown on dissent. \u2026 NATO strategists are thinking more in terms of pouring large quantities of anti-tank and anti-air rockets, mortars and heavy machine guns into the protest centers for beating back the government armored forces. (DEBKAfile, NATO to give rebels anti-tank weapons, August 14, 2011).<\/p>\n
Michel Chossudovsky wrote in Global Research, May 3, 2011:<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Daraa \u201cprotest movement\u201d on March 18 had all the appearances of a staged event involving, in all likelihood, covert support to Islamic terrorists by Mossad and\/or Western intelligence. Government sources point to the role of radical Salafist groups (supported by Israel)<\/p>\n
Syria is a secular Arab country, a society of religious tolerance, where Muslims and Christians have for several centuries lived in peace. Hizb ut-Tahrir (the Party of Liberation) is a radical political movement committed to the creation of an Islamic caliphate. In Syria, its avowed objective is to destabilize the secular state.<\/p>\n
Since the Soviet-Afghan war, Western intelligence agencies as well as Israel\u2019s Mossad have consistently used various Islamic terrorist organizations as \u201cintelligence assets\u201d. Both Washington and its indefectible British ally have provided covert support to \u201cIslamic terrorists\u201d in Afghanistan, Bosnia, Kosovo and Libya, etc. as a means to triggering ethnic strife, sectarian violence and political instability.<\/p>\n
The staged protest movement in Syria is modelled on Libya. The insurrection in Eastern Libya is integrated by the Libya Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) which is supported by MI6 and the CIA. The ultimate objective of the Syria protest movement, through media lies and fabrications, is to create divisions within Syrian society as well as justify an eventual \u201chumanitarian intervention\u201d.\u201d<\/p>\n
The emergence of Daesh in Iraq and Syria was not a surprise for US- and NATO strategists, not a \u201ccollateral damage\u201d, but a consequence which was completely calculated.<\/p>\n